Bitcoin ETF Inflows Hit $102M as Ethereum ETF Adds $50M
Bitcoin ETF inflows reached $102 million in the latest daily update, while Ethereum ETF inflows came in at $50 million, putting both U. S.
Bitcoin ETF inflows reached $102 million in the latest daily update, while Ethereum ETF inflows came in at $50 million, putting both U.S. spot crypto ETF groups in positive territory and leaving Bitcoin with the larger intake.
TL;DR Key Points
- Bitcoin led the latest ETF flow update.
- Ethereum also posted a positive daily reading.
- The available evidence supports a narrow conclusion: both categories were positive in the same reporting window.
Farside’s Bitcoin ETF tracker lists $102 million in net inflows, while its Ethereum ETF tracker shows $50 million. Taken together, those two tables support a limited claim: both U.S. spot ETF categories closed the same update with positive net additions.
Bitcoin kept the lead in the latest ETF snapshot
Using the totals shown on Farside’s BTC page and Farside’s ETH page, Bitcoin accounted for the larger share of the combined flow total. That same split is the core fact reflected on SoSoValue’s U.S. spot BTC ETF page and its U.S. spot ETH ETF page.
Coinlive has recently tracked ETF turnover in a report on seven Bitcoin ETFs returning to inflows after a $265 million outflow and in a separate piece on institutions selling Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs while buying XRP and HYPE again. In this case, the publishable evidence still comes back to Farside’s BTC table and its ETH table, which show both segments in positive territory with BTC ahead.
Ethereum stayed positive, but below Bitcoin
The ETH reading confirms breadth, not parity
Farside’s ETH table and SoSoValue’s ETH dashboard both support the narrower reading that Ethereum ETFs also added money in the latest entry. Because that ETH total sat below the BTC figure shown on the Bitcoin tracker, the data supports follow-through across both products without supporting any claim of equal demand.
The research brief for this run is explicitly incomplete, so the strongest defensible takeaway remains the dashboard evidence itself. Agreement between Farside’s BTC page, Farside’s ETH page, SoSoValue’s BTC page, and its ETH page is enough to say both ETF groups posted inflows in the same update, but not enough to extend the story into price action, sentiment, or broader institutional narratives.
Readers who want wider ETF competition context can compare this flow snapshot with Coinlive’s earlier look at gold versus Bitcoin ETFs in 2026. For this article, though, the sourcing stays intentionally tight around the BTC flow table and the ETH flow table.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
Author
Akita Inu
Akita Inu covers fast-moving crypto market updates, exchange news, and token ecosystem developments for CoinLive, with a focus on concise source-led reporting.